Legal Opinion

Everett v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1941No. L. A. 16618PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The appellants were enjoined from erecting or maintaining certain fences and embankments, upon a determination that by their use surface waters had been diverted to the damage of the adjoining landowner. In challenging the correctness of -this decree, they assert, contrary to the court’s findings, that these were flood waters, a common enemy against which they had a right to protect their property.

The land of the respondent, upon which there is a valuable orchard, lies on each side of a public road. On the northerly side of this road, and adjoining it on the east, is the property of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API