Everett v. Davis
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The appellants were enjoined from erecting or maintaining certain fences and embankments, upon a determination that by their use surface waters had been diverted to the damage of the adjoining landowner. In challenging the correctness of -this decree, they assert, contrary to the court’s findings, that these were flood waters, a common enemy against which they had a right to protect their property.
The land of the respondent, upon which there is a valuable orchard, lies on each side of a public road. On the northerly side of this road, and adjoining it on the east, is the property of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.