Legal Opinion
State v. Vincent
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 7, 1984No. 10572PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
After a trial to the court, the defendant was found guilty of burglary in the third degree and larceny in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-1031 and 53a-125,2 respectively. On appeal, he raises three issues, claiming that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, (2) denying his supplemental motion in arrest of judgment for failure of the information to charge an offense, and (3) denying his motion for acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence. In addition, the state has noted an error in the sentence on the larceny…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.