Legal Opinion

State v. Dorau

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 8, 1938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The defendant, manager of a motion picture theater in Middletown, having been convicted of a violation of law in operating a so-called “Bank Night,” appealed. The case was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts and the nominal penalty imposed shows that this is a test case to determine whether such Nights as conducted by the defendant violate our criminal law. A Colorado corporation owns the rights in the plan of operating these Nights, protected by copyright and patent application, and it gives licenses to theaters to use the plan, the defendant’s theater being so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. FaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. EamesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for WomenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API