Legal Opinion

Reefer Queen Co., Inc. v. MARINE CONSTR. AND DESIGN CO.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1968No. 39717PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

This is a products liability action commenced by plaintiff to recover damages for loss of use and profits of its tuna fisher, the Reefer Queen. The plaintiff-respondent will be referred to as the plaintiff corporation. The action was brought against the J. M. Martinac Shipbuilding Corporation, referred to herein as Martinac, and Marine Construction and Design Company, referred to herein as Marco. Marco joined its subcontractor, Mantel Gear Works, Inc., referred to herein as Mantel, as a third-party defendant.

Plaintiff corporation owned an army hull which it desired to convert…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barbier v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hill v. C. & E. Constr. Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Miller Industries, Cross-Appellants v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Burford Equipment Co., Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. El Fredo Pizza, Inc. v. Roto-Flex Oven Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API