Legal Opinion

Requena v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 2019No. 116251PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.:

*920 Adrian M. Requena filed a pro se K.S.A. 60-1507 motion almost 15 years after his rape conviction. The Butler County District Court summarily denied the motion after considering a written response by the State. On appeal, Requena argues the district court violated his due process rights when it failed to appoint counsel to represent him. We hold Requena's due process rights were not violated, and summary denial was appropriate because he failed to establish a manifest injustice to excuse his untimely filing. Accordingly, we affirm.

A jury…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. United States v. Andrew SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BurdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. MaberryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. Perales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API