Legal Opinion

State v. Maberry

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 22, 2020No. 120972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

No. 120,972 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MABERRY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Supreme Court Rule 134(a) (2020 Kan. S. Ct. R. 200) provides that if the district court rules on a motion or other application when an affected party who has appeared in the action is not present—either in person or by the party's attorney—the court immediately must serve notice of the ruling. 2. To satisfy the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell (ID 81096) v. Kansas, State ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API