Legal Opinion

State v. Burden

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 17, 2020No. 116810PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,810 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AMBER E. BURDEN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court exercises de novo review over the legal question of whether a judge may refuse to allow a criminal defendant to exercise his or her constitutional right of self-representation because of mental incompetence. But an appellate court will review a district court's factual findings about mental competency for an abuse of discretion. 2. Under Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 128 S. Ct. 2379,

171 L. Ed. 2d 345

(2008), the United States…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KemmerlySupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  3. In re B.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API