Siebenhauer v. Bank of California National Ass'n
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The complaint alleges conversion of a security denominated a Spring Valley bond in the principal sum of one thousand dollars. Defendant answered with a general denial. The court made findings and gave judgment in its favor. Plaintiff has appealed upon the judgment-roll. The facts are not in dispute.
The ease turns upon the question of whether the bond in suit is or is not a negotiable instrument within the meaning of the law-merchant as disclosed by our negotiable instruments statute and supplementary enactments. The facts necessary to grasp the questions involved will now be set forth:
Plaintif…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Crocker Nat'l Bank of San Francisco v. Byrne & McDonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marine National Exchange Bank v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gerrish v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Stiller v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- J. S. Judge & Co. v. LilleyPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1937
- Van Lee Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.