Legal Opinion

Siebenhauer v. Bank of California National Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 14063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The complaint alleges conversion of a security denominated a Spring Valley bond in the principal sum of one thousand dollars. Defendant answered with a general denial. The court made findings and gave judgment in its favor. Plaintiff has appealed upon the judgment-roll. The facts are not in dispute.

The ease turns upon the question of whether the bond in suit is or is not a negotiable instrument within the meaning of the law-merchant as disclosed by our negotiable instruments statute and supplementary enactments. The facts necessary to grasp the questions involved will now be set forth:

Plaintif…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Crocker Nat'l Bank of San Francisco v. Byrne & McDonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marine National Exchange Bank v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gerrish v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Stiller v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. J. S. Judge & Co. v. LilleyPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1937
  5. Van Lee Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API