Legal Opinion

Stiller v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

69 Cal.App.2d Supp. 805 (1945)

FRANK STILLER, Respondent,

v.

BETTY ROGERS et al., Defendants; BERTRAM S. HARRIS, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

May 29, 1945.

Bertram S. Harris, in pro per., and Joseph Duchowny for Appellant.

Paul G. McIver for Respondent.

KINCAID, J.

The real question before us for determination is whether the evidence supports the court's findings that of the $200 received by the defendant lawyer from the sheriff, on order of Betty Rogers, $149 was money stolen from plaintiff by her and that the defendant knew or should have known that such money was so stolen. The fact that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Nat'l Bank of Bridgeport v. Perris Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Weiner v. RoofCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fortier v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Mohr v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. RauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. United States v. LimbsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API