Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. 60997PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Darryl Hamilton, appeals from jury convictions of first degree robbery in violation of § 569.020 RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to concurrent terms of life imprisonment. After sentencing, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion which the motion court denied without an evidentiary hearing. These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(Z). 1 We affirm.

Since defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, we need not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. DanbackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. BallerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. ChapmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API