Harris v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
These actions were brought, one by J. C. Harris, and the other by Lloyd Harris, by his guardian ad litem, J. C. Harris, to recover for damages growing out of a grade crossing accident. The two cases were tried together. At the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs, defendant’s motion for a nonsuit in each case was granted. Plaintiffs have appealed and present the two causes together.
The rights of the parties must be disposed of by the testimony of the appellants, J. C. Harris and his son Lloyd, the latter at the time of the accident being between fifteen and sixteen years of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cable v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Sadler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Thornton v. HamiltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Golay v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Benedict v. HinesWashington Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Boscarello v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Sanderson v. Hartford Eastern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Gillum v. Pacific Coast Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.