Legal Opinion

Boscarello v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 7, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The deceased was killed when the automobile in which he was riding as a passenger was struck by an engine of the defendant company at a grade-crossing. The plaintiff obtained a verdict and the defendant has appealed from the refusal of the trial court to set it aside, as well as from the judgment because of errors it claimed were committed in the course of the trial.

The defendant bases its appeal from the refusal of the trial court to set the verdict aside mainly upon the ground that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Upon that issue the facts are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Jameson v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Weidlich v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Virginia & Southwestern Railway Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dennison v. KlotzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Smith v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Farkas v. HalliwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Kwasniewski v. N.Y., N.H., H.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API