Legal Opinion

Gillum v. Pacific Coast Railroad Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1929No. 21417. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondents, Gillum, recovered in this action against tbe appellant, Pacific Coast Bail- road Company, in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars for personal injuries suffered by the respondent Jessie Gillum.

The accident causing the injury happened at the intersection of Horton and Colorado streets, both public streets of the city of Seattle. Horton street at this place extends east and west. It is fifty feet wide. Its middle section is paved with brick for a width of thirty-five feet, and it is used somewhat extensively by pedestrians and vehicles. Colorado street extends north and south,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erb v. MoraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Sadler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Twedt v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McKinney v. Port Townsend & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Harris v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. GentleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Graves v. MickelWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Sanderson v. Hartford Eastern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API