Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1988No. 1329PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Attorney George R. Zaiser appeals from the order entered September 9, 1987, in the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County, denying his petition to withdraw as defense counsel in the matter of Commonwealth v. Roman. We reverse.

Appellant, a Pennsylvania attorney, was hired to represent Luis R. Roman in two criminal cases — one dealing with delivery of cocaine, the other with possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession of cocaine, and possession of a small amount of marijuana. Appellant and Roman entered into a fee arrangement which provided that in the event Roman…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. SchepsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hammond v. TJ Litle and Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. MageeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. Reading Group Two Properties, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. ChampneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API