Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Magee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2017No. 3459 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SOLANO, J.:

Appellants- Schindler Law Group, LLC, Thomas K. Schindler, Esquire, and John H. Pavloff, Esquire (collectively, “Schindler”) appeal. from the order denying Schindler’s motion to withdraw as criminal defense counsel for Brian Thomas Magee, Jr. We affirm. ' '

Magee was arrested and imprisoned in September 2015 for defrauding three customers by accepting deposits for home improvements and then failing, to perform the work.1 The three cases were consolidated for trial. Magee remained in- custody because he was unable to post bail.

Magee retained Schindler in October 2016.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Samuel Randolph, IV v. Secretary Pennsylvania DepartmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. Keesee, J. v. Dougherty, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Fortune, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Marshall, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Marshall, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API