Legal Opinion

Bilby v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1913No. 2881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Hughes County; P. W. Gardner, Judge. Action by Nicholas V. Bilby against William Brown and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The plaintiff, Nicholas V. Bilby, was in possession of the land described in the petition in this case, occupying it by his tenants, Robert and Rube Pollock. One Gilliland claimed the land under a deed from the heirs of Little Peter, a Creek Indian. In the month of November, 1910, about the time the Pollocks had moved from the land, Gilliland had the defendants, Brown and Bean, move upon the land- and take possession as his tenants. The evidence shows that the two defendants moved their effects to the place before the Pollocks moved away, but the Pollocks made no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emsley v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Campbell v. CoonradtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Chisholm v. WeiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Brown v. FeaginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Hall v. HainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Hill v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API