Legal Opinion

Hill v. Burnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1918No. 8078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Wlashington County; R. I-I. Hudson, Judge. Action by Alfred Dodge Hill, a minor, by Erank L. Hill, his guardian, against William James .Burnett, a minor, by Bates B. Burnett, his guardian. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was brought by plaintiff in error against defendant- in error, and involves the correctness of a decision by the Department of the Interior relative to a contest of an allotment of land in the Cherokee Indian Nation, and the award of a patent to the land in controversy. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

We are first met with a motion to dismiss this appeal, upon the ground:

“That the case-made was settled! and signed prior to the expiration of the time fixed for suggesting amendments, and that the defendants had not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  4. Rector v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Ross v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API