Legal Opinion

People v. Peals

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2006No. Docket 128376PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*638CORRIGAN, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the weapon at issue in this case constituted a “firearm” as defined in MCL 750.222(d), and thus whether defendant was properly convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, MCL 750.224f(l); and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b. We hold that the text of the statutory definition indicates that a weapon is a firearm if it is the type of weapon that was designed or intended to propel a dangerous projectile by an explosive, gas, or air. The definition describes the category of weapons that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Western Michigan University Board of Control v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. Hardy; People v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. Metamora Water Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. Flick; People v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. ReddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API