Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Perkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2005No. Docket 126727PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted leave in this case to consider two issues involving MCL 750.224f, which sets forth restrictions concerning the possession1 of firearms by persons having been convicted of a felony. The first is whether larceny from the person is a “specified felony” for the purposes of MCL 750.224f(6)(i), thus subjecting defendant to more stringent requirements in order to regain his right to possess a firearm. We conclude that larceny from the person involves a substantial risk that force will be used during its commission and, therefore, hold that it is a specified felony.

The second issue is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. KoonceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. United States v. Larry D. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. People v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. JiminezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. DupreeMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. BassMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. HarversonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. GuajardoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API