Legal Opinion
Von Steen v. Musch
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.
This is a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7502 (b) and 7503 (b), seeking a stay of arbitration. On or about April 14, 2003, Elisabeth Musch, a client of Steven Von Steen, an investment advisor, sent petitioners a demand for arbitration and *208filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Petitioner commenced this proceeding on June 18, 2003, serving Musch’s attorney by personal service that day.
Facts
On September 11, 2000, petitioner Von Steen Asset Management, Inc. and Musch entered into an investment management…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- XO Communications, LLC v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Von Steen v. MuschNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004