Legal Opinion
Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. Bybyk
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 19, 1996No. 370, Docket 94-9246PublishedCited by 347 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
In 1987, respondents-appellees Joyce and Michael Bybyk opened an investment account with petitioner-appellant PaineWebber Incorporated. On March 14, 1990, the parties executed a client agreement which contained an arbitration clause. That clause (which had retrospective as well as prospective effect) provided for the arbitration of “any and all controversies which may arise” concerning the account. The client agreement further provided that all claims were to be arbitrated in accordance with the “rules of the organization convening the panel.”
On September 24,1993, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by347 opinions
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. BelandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Pike v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.