Legal Opinion

Consolidated Metco, Inc. v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 23, 1984No. A8005-02531; CA A25357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in a proceeding brought to determine the validity of Portland Area Local Government Boundary Commission orders annexing certain property to the city of Portland. After the case was argued, we asked the parties to file supplemental memoranda regarding the circuit court’s jurisdiction of the declaratory judgment proceeding. We now conclude that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction. It is therefore our duty to refuse to proceed further. League of Women Voters v. Lane Co. Bndry Comm., 32 Or App 53, 59, 573 P2d 1255, rev den 283 Or 503 (1978);…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters of Central Lane County v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Marion County Fire District 1 v. Marion-Polk County Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Union Oil Co. v. Clackamas County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. City of Wood Village v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. City of Fairview v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API