Legal Opinion

Wusthoff v. Schwartz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1903No. 4688PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. George Meade Emory, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

Appellants brought this action to recover damages by reason of an alleged eviction from a tenement occupied by them as tenants under respondent. The complaint alleges that appellants paid the rent for the premises each month in advance, and that the same was paid, including the whole of the month of June, 1901; that at divers times between May 10, 1901, and June 17 of the same year the respondent, without permission or consent of appellants, wilfully and without cause wrongfully entered upon said premises, and proceeded to tear down portions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dyett v. PendletonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  2. Skally v. ShutsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Edmison v. LowrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Jackson v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Cline v. AltoseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bancroft v. GodwinWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gibson v. ThisiusWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Lindenberg v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API