Legal Opinion

Cline v. Altose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1930No. 22305. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action, the respondents Cline recovered in dámages against the appellants Altóse, as for a wrongful eviction from certain real property which the respondents held under lease from the appellants. The action was tried to a jury, in which a verdict was returned in the sum of $3,500. From a judgment entered on the verdict, the appeal is prosecuted.

The principal contention of the appellants is that the evidence does not sustain the verdict of the jury. It may aid to an understanding of the question involved if something of the history of the transactions out of which, the controversy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wusthoff v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Tennes v. American Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Thompson v. R. B. Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Brewster Cigar Co. v. AtwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API