Legal Opinion
State v. Hernandez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 16, 2005No. AC 23384PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Gregory Hernandez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of possession of narcotics with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress physical evidence and statements that he made to the police. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. On May 22, 2001, at approximately 10:06 p.m., the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StraubConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. DaysConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. TuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.