Legal Opinion

Bohenek v. Niedzwiecki

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 22, 1955PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by negligence. The plaintiff had a verdict which the trial court, upon the defendant’s motion, set aside as against the law. The plaintiff has appealed.

The claims of proof may be stated briefly as follows: On December 24, 1947, the plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. While proceeding through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the automobile, owing to the defendant’s negligence, collided with a truck and the plaintiff was injured. The plaintiff and the defendant were then and are now…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Gibson v. FullinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Landers v. LandersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Teitelman v. BloomsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API