Legal Opinion
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 2000No. SC 16156PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court in the present insurance coverage case properly applied New York law under the analytical approach of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, which this court adopted in Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 243 Conn. 401, 703 A.2d 1132 (1997).
The relevant underlying facts are described fully in Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., supra, 243 Conn. 401. We briefly review those facts supplemented by certain additional facts relevant to the present appeal.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- MacOmber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- American States Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bulldog New York LLC v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.