Legal Opinion
Teitelman v. Bloomstein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1967PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to set aside a directed verdict for the defendant. The appeal is defective in form because it is taken from the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict rather than from the final judgment. General Statutes § 52-263; Practice Book § 600; Palega v. Bulgajewski, 150 Conn. 695,186 A.2d 801; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 183. The defendant, however, by failing to move to dismiss the appeal, has waived the defect. Desmarais v. Pinto, 147 Conn. 109, 110, 157 A.2d 596; Van Detti v. Parsons Bros., Inc., 146…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Fritch v. J. M. English Truck Line, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
- Desmarais v. PintoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. BausmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Furstein v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.