Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
In this action for breach of contract and insurance bad faith, defendant and appellant Pacific Specialty Insurance Company appeals from a postjudgment order denying the expert witness fees it incurred in successfully defending against plaintiffs and respondents Lars and Lisa Rouland’s claims. Pacific Specialty sought its expert witness fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 because the Roulands did not accept Pacific Specialty’s pretrial settlement offers and thereafter failed to obtain a more favorable judgment at trial. The trial court found Pacific Specialty could…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Berg v. DardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Chaaban v. Wet Seal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Whatley-Miller v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Martin v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Toste v. CalPortland ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sanford v. RasnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm General Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Ins. Co. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.