Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Owens River Canal Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1932No. Docket No. 8140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment entered upon the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs.

It is contended by the appellants that the trial court erred in overruling defendants’ general and special demurrers to the complaint, also in granting the said motion for judgment on the pleadings. Following the references to the parties made by counsel in their briefs, the plaintiff and respondent, City of Los Angeles; plaintiff and respondent, Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, and the defendant and appellant, The Owens River Canal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. California Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Wickersham v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Umatilla Water, Users' Ass'n v. IrvinOregon Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dedrick v. California Whaling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Mayellen Apartments, Inc. v. PacmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Centrifugal National Concentrator Co. v. EcclestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API