Legal Opinion
Dedrick v. California Whaling Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 27, 1936No. Civ. 10294PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The petitioners sued for a writ of mandate to require the respondents to call a special meeting of the shareholders of the corporation under the provisions of section 313 of the Civil Code. An alternative writ of mandate and order to show cause was issued and return thereto made by the respondents Biggins and Kerrigan.
The petition alleges that since August 27, 1932, the Whaling Company has been a corporation organized under the laws of Nevada with a capital stock of 3,000 shares; that since its organization it has been doing business in .the state of California; that all its . property is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rolapp v. Federal Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Potomac Oil Co. v. DyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Stabler v. El Dora Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- City of Los Angeles v. Owens River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Humboldt Oil Co. v. HoaglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Gonzales v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Beeler v. BeelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Ecker Bros. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.