Legal Opinion

Ferrara & DiMercurio, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 5, 1997No. Civil Action No. 94-10574-WAGPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS (DOCKET ENTRY #72)

BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

On May 16, 1997, plaintiff Ferrara & DiMercurio, Inc. (“Ferrara”) filed a motion to compel defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) to produce its entire claims file. On May 20, 1997, Ferrara filed a supplementary pleading elaborating upon its arguments in the original motion. Also on May 20, 1997, this court held a hearing and took the motion under advisement pending further submissions from the parties. On May 21, 1997, St.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  4. PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. v. Lake County Park & Recreation BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. In re a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API