Legal Opinion
Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 28, 2009No. 07-127CPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court in the above-captioned case is plaintiffs amended motion to compel. Plaintiff contends that defendant has not sufficiently responded to its discovery requests in a number of ways. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs motion.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual History1
On June 15, 1995, plaintiff assumed an existing lease offered by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) to operate a marina on the Eden Isle Peninsula of Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 5,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Talismanic Props., LLC v. Tipp CityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.