State v. Eyre
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
DURRANT, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Defendant Kevan Eyre appeals his convictions on six counts of felony tax evasion. Eyre argues that the State presented insufficient evidence to support a conviction for tax evasion by failing to prove the existence of a tax deficiency, which Eyre asserts is a necessary element of the offense of tax evasion. Eyre also argues that his trial counsel pro*794vided ineffective assistance by making several missteps at trial. We hold that the existence of a tax deficiency is an element of Utah’s felony tax evasion statute. We also find that Eyre’s trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Jensen v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LitiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Petersen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SteedUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MarchetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Tolman v. Logan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.