Legal Opinion

Tolman v. Logan City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 27, 2007No. 20060713-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Presiding Judge:

1] 1 Plaintiffs Thomas W. and Verla F. Tol-man (the Tolmans) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Logan City (the City), which resulted in the dismissal of the Tolmans' complaint. The trial court did not err in dismissing either of the Tolmans' takings claims, as their claim based on the 1989 enactment of a zoning ordinance was barred by the statute of limitations and their claim based on the 2004 denial of their rezoning application failed as a matter of law. The trial court also correctly determined that the City's denial of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Lee v. GaufinUtah Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Gillmor v. Summit CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fraughton v. Utah State Tax Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API