Legal Opinion

In Re Meo

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1988No. Bankruptcy 1-84-00280PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM CONCERNING MOTION TO RE-OPEN TIME FOR FILING COMPLAINTS OBJECTING TO DISCHARGE

ROBERT J. WOODSIDE, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of Maryland Casualty Company and its parent company, American General Life Insurance Company of Delaware (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Maryland Casualty”) to re-open the time for filing complaints objecting to discharge of the debtors under 11 U.S.C. § 727. Movants concede that they have missed the time period for objecting to discharge specified in Bankruptcy Rule 4004(a) 1 and that this court is not authorized to extend that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ShebelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
  2. Werner v. Puente (In Re Puente)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1985
  3. First National Bank of Harrisburg v. Jones (In Re Jones)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1987
  4. Cobb v. Hadley (In Re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  5. Gordon's Jewelry Co. of New Jersey v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New World Marketing Corp. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. DeAngelis v. Rychalsky (In Re Rychalsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
  3. England v. Stevens (In Re Stevens)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Anderson v. Poole (In Re Poole)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Ross v. Mitchell (In re Dietz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API