England v. Stevens (In Re Stevens)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge:
The bankruptcy court held that appellant could not bring a complaint objecting to the debtor’s discharge pursuant to Section 727 during the period starting after the last date to timely file a complaint objecting to discharge under Section 727(a), as set forth in Rule 4004(a), and ending with the date when a discharge was actually entered, after which an action may be brought under Section 727(d) to revoke the discharge. 1 We hold that a party may bring an action under Section 727(d) during that period, as if a discharge had been entered. Debtors…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Moses Hill, Debtor. Phelix Jones, Creditors v. Moses Hill, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Hugh B. Codding, Codding Enterprises v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lincoln Thrift Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zedan v. HabashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- In Re Claude Emery, Debtor. Citibank, N.A. v. Claude EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tighe v. Valencia (In Re Guadarrama)District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Silver (In Re Silver)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Walton v. Staub (In Re Staub)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.