Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Krauter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1996No. Civil 960022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment that Ralph and Hazel M. Lutz failed to create an easement over the property of Adam and Ann Krauter. The Lutzes claim the trial court erred in its conclusion an easement did not exist either as a matter of law or by implication. Because the trial court did not err in finding a valid easement did not exist, we affirm.

In 1977, the Lutzes purchased real property described as Lots One and Two of Block One in Haag’s Addition to the City of Dickinson, North Dakota. The property was conveyed by a warranty deed. The Lutzes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Malloy v. BoettcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Royse v. Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children & Adults, Inc. of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Roll v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griffeth v. EidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mougey Farms v. KaspariNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Estate of ShirranWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. McMorrowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tamm v. Gatzke, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API