In Re Estate of Shirran

MACY, Justice.

The district court granted Appellee James D. Shirran an implied easement across Appellant George T. (Tom) Shirran’s property. Tom appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration, alteration, or amendment of the judgment.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Tom presents several issues for our consideration:

I. Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law when it failed to address the release language and ascribed to it the parties’ intentions to settle their differences.

II. Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law when it held that Appellee has an implied…