Legal Opinion

Kiefer v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 1989No. CR 88-49PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant, John W. Kiefer, was convicted of rape and incest. He raises three points of appeal. First, he contends his statement admitting having sexual intercourse with his 14-year-old daughter should have been suppressed because the officer who arrested him, Hoxie Police Chief Paul Hendrix, violated Ark. R. Crim. P. 2.3 by failing to inform him he did not have to come to the chiefs office after Hendrix requested that he do so. Also under this point, he argues the form he signed, acknowledging his rights had been explained, was inadequate and that his statement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Coble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Sublett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API