State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue presented is whether the commission abused its discretion in awarding claimant TTD compensation for the period from November 21, 1989 to February 21, 1991. Kroger’s primary contention is that res judicata applies to prevent claimant from relitigating the issue of TTD compensation for periods preceding February 22, 1991. Kroger argues that this “same issue was previously heard [and] decided adversely to the Claimant” during the proceedings on claimant’s first motion for TTD compensation.
Res judicata operates “to preclude the relitigation of a point of law or fact that was at issue in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. General Refractories Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Hutt v. Frick-Gallagher Mfg. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Meyer v. ChieffoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ohio v. Foster (In Re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Sheridan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Tantarelli v. Decapua Ents., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.