Legal Opinion

Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1953No. 669PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

That the plaintiff was an invitee of the defendant at the time he suffered his injuries is not debatable. Pafford v. Construction Co., 217 N.C. 730, 9 S.E. 2d 408.

So far, however, this Court has not held that water alone, unmixed with oil or grease or other slippery substance, on a floor over which an invitee may be expected to pass, creates a hazard against which the proprietor must guard. Counsel do not call our attention to any decision from any other jurisdiction to that effect. See, however, Kresge Co. v. *732Fader, 158 N.E. 174, 58 A.L.R. 132; Jutras v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 147 A. 753;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blevins v. FranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Dawson v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Taylor v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Clary v. Alexander County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Atwater v. CastleburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API