Legal Opinion

Atwater v. Castlebury

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1987No. 8610SC645PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree.

A motion for a directed verdict tests the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury. West v. Slick, 313 N.C. 33, 326 S.E. 2d 601 (1985).

When a motion for a directed verdict is made under Rule 50, the trial judge must determine whether the evidence taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which can be drawn therefrom, was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. In ruling on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hissong v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API