Clary v. Alexander County Board of Education
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
The sole question for decision in this case is whether plaintiffs’ evidence when considered in its most favorable light for the plaintiffs discloses contributory negligence as a matter of law. The trial court answered this question in the affirmative, and we agree.
As a student participating in pre-season practice for the Stony Point High School basketball team, Roger Dale Clary was an invitee on the property of defendant. See Hood v. Coach Co., 249 N.C. 534, 107 S.E. 2d 154; Pafford v. Construction Co., 217 N.C. 730, 9 S.E. 2d 408. A landlord owes a duty to an invitee to use…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Railway Express Agency Inc. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Daniel v. City of MorgantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Turpin v. Our Lady of Mercy Catholic ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Townsend ex rel. Carter v. Noah Akers FryeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976