Legal Opinion

Chudik v. Hirshfeld

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 8, 2021No. 20-1833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case: 20-1833 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ STEVEN C. CHUDIK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1833 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:19-cv-01163-AJT-JFA, Judge Anthony J. Trenga. ______________________ Decided:…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  2. McCutchen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  3. Nicely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. Sawstop Holding LLC v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API