Lord v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8102 (T. D. 37389). [Oral argument Eeb. 12,1918, by Mr. washbum and Mr. Hanson.)
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
Certain figured cotton cloth was imported by appellants here and returned and assessed for duty as Jacquard figured manufactures of cotton at 30 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 258 of the tariff act of 1913. The importers protested this assessment, claiming the merchandise to be dutiable at the appropriate rate under paragraph 252 as cotton cloth.
Pending hearing upon this protest- the Board of General Appraisers in another case—see G. A. 7618 (T. D. 34858), decision in which was affirmed in this court in United States v. Sherman & Sons Co. et al. (6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 271; T. D.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cramer v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. CambustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Hoeninghaus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Prosser v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. ShermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Maiden Lane Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Mecke v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924