Legal Opinion
Hystad v. Industrial Commission
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1986No. Civ. 11044PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
The Industrial Commission of North Dakota (Commission) and Exeter Exploration Company (Exeter) appeal from a district court judgment reversing in part a Commission order establishing spacing units in the Poe-Red River Pool. The issues relate to the Commission’s statutory authority to order different size spacing units for a pool when it enters its initial order establishing proper spacing, and whether an order for such spacing units was supported by substantial and credible evidence. We conclude that the Commission has the authority to order different size spacing units for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Amoco Production Co. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Grace v. Oil Conservation Commission of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Triangle Oilfield Services, Inc. v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Evans v. BackesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Hanson v. Industrial Commission of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.