Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1962No. 6830PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

Appellants seek to reverse the judgment of the district court, which, on appeal, affirmed a contested order by the appellee commission.

Appellants are seven of the producers of natural gas in the Jalmat Pool, and the appellees, in addition to the Oil Conservation Commission, consist of one of the producers in the same field and three pipeline companies which take gas from the field. Th,e Oil Conservation Commission, as appellee, is also a cross-appellant on a question which will later be discussed.

The law creating the Oil Conservation Commission was originally enacted as Ch.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. California Co. v. State Oil & Gas BoardMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Santa Fe Exploration Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McMillan v. American General Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lion's Gate Water v. D'ANTONIONew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API