Hanson v. Industrial Commission of North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Robert E. Hanson has appealed from a district court judgment affirming the Industrial Commission’s denial of his application to dispose of produced saltwater from the State F-24 well by injecting it into the Madison formation through the State F-22A well. We affirm.
Hanson is a working interest owner in the State F-24 well in the NEVi NE 1 /) of Section 36, Township 160 North, Range 95 West, and in the State F-22A well in the NEVí SEVi of Section 36. The State F-24 well produces about 13 barrels of oil and 165 barrels of water per day from the Madison formation. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Application of Bank of RhameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Americana Healthcare Center v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Dahm v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.