Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Industrial Commission of North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1991No. Civ. 900254PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Robert E. Hanson has appealed from a district court judgment affirming the Industrial Commission’s denial of his application to dispose of produced saltwater from the State F-24 well by injecting it into the Madison formation through the State F-22A well. We affirm.

Hanson is a working interest owner in the State F-24 well in the NEVi NE 1 /) of Section 36, Township 160 North, Range 95 West, and in the State F-22A well in the NEVí SEVi of Section 36. The State F-24 well produces about 13 barrels of oil and 165 barrels of water per day from the Madison formation. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Application of Bank of RhameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Americana Healthcare Center v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dahm v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API