Legal Opinion
Far East Aluminium Works Co. v. Viracon, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 9, 2022No. 21-1875PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1875 ___________________________ Far East Aluminium Works Co. Ltd. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Viracon, Inc. Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: October 21, 2021 Filed: March 9, 2022 ____________ Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ STRAS, Circuit Judge. This case serves as a reminder that contractual remedies can be limited, particularly when sophisticated commercial parties are involved.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Jenkins v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Enervations, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Dave Thomas v. United Steelworkers Local 1938Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- James Hartman v. Beary BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Elijah Wells v. Creighton Preparatory SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Larry Muff v. Wells Fargo Bank NACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Aaron S. Mohammed v. Creighton University, Dr. Jun Xia, and Dr. Yusi FuDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- Abram v. SohlerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.